VyrsaDiscuss your application
Solutions/Vyrsa Assure

Vyrsa Assure · Built by a software development team

Your automated regression suite. Built for you. Maintained for you.

Give your team automated regression coverage without pulling them away from the work at hand.

We explore your application, identify important workflows and build a ready-to-run suite. We handle the test code, test data and setup, working alongside your development schedule.

Own the finished suite. Run it yourself, or let us maintain it.

Discuss your application

Start with a URL and test access. We bring back the business rules to confirm—mostly simple yes/no questions with context. See the three starting points →

Initial build: 2–4 weeks · Web & API · Optional maintenance

Interactive sample · Playwright · Chromium

45Passed

2Failed

1Setup error

12.8sDuration

auth.spec.ts › user can sign inPassed1.1s
permissions.spec.ts › viewer cannot edit invoicesPassed842ms
orders.spec.ts › failed payment does not create orderFailed4.1s
global.setup.ts › seed test accountError412ms

+ 43 more passing tests

Failure evidence · customer completes card payment

Retry 1 of 1

Error: expect(locator).toBeVisible() failed
Locator: getByText('Payment confirmed')
Expected: visible · Timeout: 5000ms
at tests/checkout/payment.spec.ts:87:42
  1. ✓Before hooks · test account and cart created
  2. ✓page.goto('/checkout')
  3. ✓getByLabel('Card number').fill('4242…')
  4. ✓getByRole('button', { name: 'Pay now' }).click()
  5. ×expect(getByText('Payment confirmed')).toBeVisible()
09:42:16.811 · console.info · payment submitted · ORD-104809:42:17.453 · console.error · POST /api/payments · 500

trace.zip · console and action log retained

CI failed · evidence retained47 tests + 1 setup check · 4 workers
Technical detail: linking workflows, tests and results

See what is checked, and what still needs a test.

For teams that need more detail, we can link agreed workflows and requirements to tests and their latest results. This makes it easier to see missing checks and decide what to add next.

  1. Requirement
  2. Business case
  3. Automated test
  4. Latest result

Illustrative scenarios and maintenance actions. These examples explain the service; they are not live client data or a hosted Vyrsa platform.

PAY-047 · Partial refundPassing & stable
Requirement
REF-12 · Customer can receive a partial refund
Business case
PAY-047 · Refund to the original payment method
Automated test
refund-partial.spec.ts
Latest result
Passed · 17 Sep 2026 · no instability in the review window

Evidence: The test verifies the refund amount, payment method and resulting order balance. Run history and execution evidence remain linked to this case.

PAY-052 · Refund after partial shipmentCoverage gap
Requirement
REF-14 · Refund after partial shipment
Business case
PAY-052 · Critical priority
Automated test
None
Latest result
Not run · scenario is not automated

Maintenance action: Confirm expected refund and shipment behaviour with the product owner, add test data and automate the scenario. Keep the gap visible until reviewed coverage is running.

PAY-031 · Card paymentNeeds attention

Suite Health Pass: The checkout locator required a fallback in 17 consecutive example runs. A maintenance item requests a permanent locator repair and repeat validation. If quarantined, the scenario stays visible as a gap in passing, stable coverage.

Where locator recovery is used, repeated recovery is a maintenance signal. It buys time; it does not establish lasting reliability.

Inspect sample failure evidence →

Keep your team focused. Hand the automation work to us.

We’re a software development team. Vyrsa Assure brings that engineering approach to the repetitive checks other technology teams need before releasing changes. We take on the implementation while your team carries on with delivery.

What we take care of

Application exploration, scenario mapping, test code, test data, execution setup and documentation. If you already have useful tests, we build on them.

What we need from you

Provide test access, confirm expected business behaviour and review the delivered suite. We explain the context and keep most clarification to simple yes/no questions, with focused follow-ups when needed.

Checks for the workflows that matter

Agree the scope around login, transactions, approvals, permissions and the APIs behind them. The suite supports your team’s testing and release decisions.

  • Web workflows
  • API checks
  • Roles and permissions
  • Business rules
  • Integration checks

The initial build: 2–4 weeks.

We agree a useful first scope based on your application and available access. Then we do the implementation in parallel with your team’s work, bringing back focused questions and a working suite to review.

Stage 01

You provide access

Share a test URL and representative user roles. Documents and code help where available, but are not required to begin.

Stage 02

We explore and confirm

We discover important workflows and bring you the scenarios and expected outcomes to confirm, mostly through contextual yes/no questions.

Stage 03

We build the suite

We write the tests, prepare test data, check reliability and set up execution. CI integration is included where access permits.

Stage 04

You receive working tests

Receive runnable tests, a list of the workflows covered, clear failure reports and instructions. Run the suite yourself or ask us to maintain it.

Under the hood: how we keep your tests maintainable

Built so your team can run and extend it.

Readable test code, consistent structure and useful reports make the delivered suite easier to work with. If you choose ongoing maintenance, we keep these up to date as your product changes.

01 · Govern

Consistent test code

Automated CI checks enforce agreed conventions: locator placement, separation of actions and assertions, business case IDs and limits on complexity. New tests must meet the same standards, including tests created with AI.

Example architecture feedback
Locator outside page/component layer
tests/order.spec.ts:47

Missing business case ID
tests/refund.spec.ts:12

Assertion inside action method
pages/CheckoutPage.ts:88

02 · Maintain

Fixing unreliable tests

With ongoing maintenance, we review unreliable checks, broken selectors and missing tests. We agree priorities, fix the problems and rerun the affected checks.

Analyse → decide → act.

03 · Connect

Workflows linked to tests

Link requirements to business cases, tests and execution history. Make uncovered critical scenarios visible without manually rebuilding a traceability spreadsheet for each management meeting.

Requirement → case → test → result.

04 · Measure

Seeing what needs adding

Record weekly or monthly snapshots against the agreed scenario catalogue. Separate automated coverage from passing, stable coverage, and show when new business scenarios are outpacing automation.

A green run can still leave a growing gap.

426 / 426 automated scenarios passing100% of the automated set passed.

426 / 600 agreed scenarios automated71% business scenario coverage. 174 scenarios remain uncovered.

Illustrative comparison. Counts refer to distinct business scenarios; several tests may protect one scenario.

Start with the access you have.

You don’t need a complete specification to begin. We deliver a working regression suite from your application, then deepen coverage as more context becomes available.

Start with your application

Explore

A URL. Test access. A working suite.

You provide

A reachable test environment and credentials for representative user roles, with permission to exercise the workflows.

You receive

Runnable automated tests covering the journeys we can discover and validate, a catalogue of the scenarios covered and visible gaps. We confirm expected outcomes with you where behaviour is ambiguous.

Start with Explore →

Add your business context

Align

Connect coverage to intended behaviour.

You provide

Application access plus any available stories, epics, documentation, test cases or existing automated tests. Share what you have; every document is not required.

You receive

A working suite mapped to acceptance criteria, business rules and documented exceptions. We reuse useful existing tests and identify missing scenarios.

Start with Align →

Add engineering context

Deepen

Reach the rules beneath the workflow.

You provide

Application access plus source code, data schemas and relevant API or integration details. Business documentation adds further context where available.

You receive

More targeted coverage of business rules, permissions, state transitions and integration boundaries, with better-informed test data and change-impact analysis.

Start with Deepen →

Start anywhere. Add context over time. Your suite grows without starting again. The same engineering standards apply at every starting point, with optional ongoing maintenance. Scope and pricing are agreed around the work and access available.

A lightweight review

Review our findings, without writing a specification.

After exploring your application, we bring you the scenarios and assumptions to confirm. Most questions are a simple yes or no, with the context and expected behaviour explained. Where something needs more detail, we ask a focused follow-up.

We do the exploration. You confirm the business rules.

Choose your current starting point

What would you like us to take off your hands?

Choose the access you can provide, your release rhythm, testing priority and business priority. See your starting point and a suggested first focus.

Your starting point0 of 4 selected
Recommended starting pointSelect four things

Start with the journeys that matter most

The plan combines available access, release rhythm, testing priority and business priority.

    Nothing you select is sent or stored. Credentials are never entered here; we arrange secure test access after the first conversation.

    Ownership

    Your suite, in your repository.

    Your team owns the test code, coverage map and documentation. We use established frameworks such as Playwright so you can run, maintain and extend the suite within your own engineering setup.

    Delivery approach

    AI-assisted. Engineer-directed.

    We use AI to accelerate application analysis and test creation. Engineers choose the risks to cover, validate the expected behaviour and stabilise the completed suite.

    Vyrsa Assure Care

    Let us keep the tests up to date.

    Keep the suite and run it yourself, or let us look after it. With optional Vyrsa Assure Care, we update tests when workflows change, fix unreliable checks and add tests for agreed new features. Your team stays focused on development; we handle the test maintenance.

    • Update existing testsAdapt checks and test data when screens, workflows and APIs change.
    • Fix unreliable checksInvestigate intermittent failures and repair the tests.
    • Add new testsExtend the suite for agreed new features and important workflows.
    • Keep you informedShow what runs, what changed and what still needs attention.
    1. Build
    2. Run
    3. Assess health
    4. Detect drift
    5. Repair or extend
    6. Repeat
    Discuss Vyrsa Assure Care

    Initial implementation and ongoing care are scoped separately. Review frequency, reporting, maintenance capacity and response expectations are agreed before work starts.

    Build new coverage or repair the signal

    Give your team a working suite without taking them off delivery.

    Start with the application you have. We do the exploration and bring you the business rules to confirm—mostly with simple yes/no answers and explained context. Add documents or engineering access when you’re ready.

    Discuss your application

    Do not send passwords through the enquiry form. We arrange secure access after the first conversation.